Skip to main content

Author: svanouse

ISSF Strengthens Conservation Measures for Seafood Companies to Elevate Transparency and Accountability in Global Tuna Supply Chains

The International Seafood Sustainability Foundation (ISSF) has adopted amendments to four of its conservation measures (CM) — 1.2Regional Fisheries Management (RFMO) Participation, 4.4c – Transshipment at Sea – Observer Coverage, 3.6 – Transactions with Vessels Implementing Best Practices for Sharks, Sea Turtles and Seabirds, and 3.7 – Vessel-Based FAD Management Policies — reinforcing the tuna sector’s leadership in science-based sustainability and transparency across global supply chains.

“The companies participating in ISSF continue to show that transparency and accountability are central to sustainable tuna fisheries,” said Tony Lazazzara, Chair, ISSF Board of Directors and Group Director of Global Fish Procurement, Thai Union Group. “These amendments strengthen oversight of at-sea transshipment and set clearer expectations for longline vessels to implement best practices that reduce bycatch of sharks, seabirds, and sea turtles. Together with improved guidance on FAD management, these updates help ensure that science-driven fishing practices translate into measurable improvements on the water.”

All four measures apply to ISSF Participating Companies, and most also affect vessels listed on ISSF’s ProActive Vessel Register (PVR), one of four public vessel lists that ISSF provides to foster transparency in tuna fishing.

Strengthened Conservation Measures

  • ISSF CM 1.2 – RFMO Participation and CM 4.4c – Transshipment at Sea: Observer Coverage
    The amendments to Conservation Measures 1.2 and 4.4(c) work in tandem to strengthen the responsible management of at-sea transshipment — a critical activity for tuna supply-chain traceability and a focus area for RFMOs.

The update to CM 1.2 clarifies that vessels engaged in at-sea transshipment must be flagged to nations that are members of the relevant RFMO, extending to transshipment vessels a requirement that has always applied to fishing vessels under this measure. This measure applies to PVR-listed vessels.

The amended CM 4.4(c) for large-scale longline vessels further reinforces this requirement by reiterating that transshipment may occur only with vessels flagged to a country that is a member of the RFMO governing the waters in which the activity occurs. In addition, transshipment vessels must now also appear on the RFMO’s publicly available record of authorized vessels for that region, helping ensure that only vessels operating under RFMO jurisdiction and oversight are used in transshipment operations.

Together, these refinements help close critical gaps in oversight, align ISSF’s measures with best-practice transshipment expectations, and provide ISSF Participating Companies with greater clarity to support transparent and accountable supply chains.

  • ISSF CM 3.6 – Transactions with Vessels Implementing Best Practices for Sharks, Sea Turtles and Seabirds
    Updates to CM 3.6 clarify requirements for seafood companies to transact only with longline vessels that implement specific best practices for reducing bycatch of sharks, seabirds, and marine turtles, including:

    • Use of circle hooks and monofilament lines (where wire trace use is prohibited)
    • No use of shark lines at any time
    • Use of whole finfish bait (where required)
    • In southern temperate latitudes, use of at least two of the following seabird mitigation methods – weighted branch lines, tori lines, and night-setting; or use hook-shielding devices

These refinements support the adoption of proven bycatch mitigation techniques for longline tuna vessels, consistent with the ISSF Skippers’ Guidebook to Sustainable Longline Fishing Practices. This measure applies to PVR-listed vessels.

  • ISSF CM 3.7 – Vessel-Based FAD Management Policies
    This amendment clarifies the measure’s applicability to anchored FADs as well as drifting FADs, providing clearer direction for vessel policies, auditing, and compliance so that best practices are implemented across all FAD types. This measure applies to PVR-listed vessels.

“ISSF’s process brings science, industry practicality, and RFMO policy together,” said Susan Jackson, ISSF President. “By refining measures as conditions evolve, we help companies lead and continue to raise the bar on verified, effective practices that protect tuna stocks and ocean ecosystems.”

A Transparent and Verified Pathway for Industry Leadership

ISSF conservation measures are developed through a robust process that draws upon the best available fisheries science and expert input from the ISSF Scientific Advisory Committee, ISSF Environmental Stakeholder Committee, and ISSF Participating Companies before adoption by the ISSF Board of Directors. This multi-stakeholder approach ensures that new or amended measures are both scientifically sound and operationally practical across the global tuna supply chain.

Once adopted, these measures apply to all ISSF Participating Companies, which represent the  majority of the world’s canned tuna processing capacity. Compliance with the measures is independently audited by the third-party firm MRAG Americas, and the results are publicly reported. Through their commitment to conform with ISSF’s suite of conservation measures — covering topics from FAD management and bycatch mitigation to monitoring and traceability — ISSF Participating Companies are helping to drive tangible, science-based improvements in tuna fisheries worldwide. Each measure update, like those amendments adopted in November 2025, reflects ISSF’s continuous-improvement model and its unique role as a bridge among science, industry, and RFMO policy reform.

Read the updated ISSF Conservation Measures:
www.iss-foundation.org/vessel-and-company-commitments/conservation-measures/our-conservation-measures/

ISSF Releases 2025 Snapshot of Large-Scale Tropical Tuna Purse Seine Fishing Fleets

The International Seafood Sustainability Foundation (ISSF) has released its updated Snapshot of the Large-Scale Tropical Tuna Purse Seine Fishing Fleets report, a unique global assessment of vessel capacity trends in tropical tuna fisheries. The authors estimate that, as of June 2025, 675 large-scale purse-seine (LSPS) vessels are fishing for tropical tuna species — an increase of 3.8% compared to last year — with a combined fish hold volume (FHV) of over 864,000 m3 (cubic meters), representing a less than 0.2% increase from last year in overall fishing capacity.

“ISSF is the only organization that aggregates and analyzes global capacity data for these fleets year over year,” said Dr. Victor Restrepo, ISSF Vice President of Science. “Our snapshot series provides science-based insights to support RFMO and industry decision-making on sustainable tuna fishing capacity management — an issue central to long-term ocean health.”

LSPS vessels, defined as those with at least 335 m³ in FHV, account for the majority of the world’s tropical tuna catch. To update the report, ISSF compiles data from RFMO vessel registries and other sources, focusing on vessels targeting skipjack, yellowfin, and bigeye tuna.

Key Findings from the 2025 Snapshot

  • New Vessel Additions: 47 LSPS vessels built after 2012 were added to RFMO authorized vessel lists since the 2024 report, including 11 newly built in 2024 and 2025. More than half are flagged to Indonesia and hover near the 335 m³ threshold.
  • Minimal Capacity Growth: While the number of LSPS vessels grew from 650 to 675, total FHV rose only marginally, from 863,100 m³ to 864,700 m³.
  • Fleet Turnover: Nine LSPS vessels were removed from the fishery due to scrapping or sinking between 2024 and 2025 — underscoring the need to account for vessel removals alongside new additions when evaluating fleet capacity.
  • Transparency on the Rise: 498 of the 675 LSPS vessels (74%) are now listed on ISSF’s independently audited ProActive Vessel Register (PVR), representing 83% of total FHV. The PVR is a voluntary transparency tool highlighting vessel practices that support sustainable tuna fisheries.
  • Flagging Patterns: For the first time, the report presents a trend analysis of flag State designations over time, showing that LSPS vessels flagged to developing or emerging economies now outnumber those flagged to developed ones by a ratio of 3.47 — more than double the ratio in the first snapshot released in 2012.
  • Global Trends: The estimated total number of all tuna purse-seine vessels worldwide rose by 9%, from 1,939 in 2024 to 2,106 in 2025. The Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission (WCPFC) region continues to host the largest number of LSPS vessels (332).
  • Cross-Regional Authorization: 12% of LSPS vessels are authorized to fish in more than one RFMO region, complicating capacity management on a regional basis.

Recommendations for Industry and RFMOs

The report offers several recommendations for vessel owners and RFMOs:

  • Expand IMO Number Use: IMO number adoption among LSPS vessels has grown from 12% in 2011 to 99% today. ISSF urges further expansion to all vessel types and sizes.
  • Improve Vessel Data Accuracy: Greater quality control in RFMO vessel registry submissions is needed to address data gaps.
  • Track Active Capacity: All RFMOs should maintain not only lists of authorized vessels but also records of vessels actively fishing each year.

“Tracking tuna fishing capacity with rigor and consistency helps ensure that sustainability efforts keep pace with evolving fleet dynamics,” said Restrepo. “Publishing this data each year is critical to promoting accountability, enabling science-based decisions, and encouraging continuous improvement across the seafood supply chain.”

View the updated report here and a related infographic here.

 

Updated ISSF Report Assesses Tuna Stock Sustainability Against MSC Criteria

The International Seafood Sustainability Foundation (ISSF) has published the latest edition of its comprehensive report, An Evaluation of the Sustainability of Global Tuna Stocks Relative to Marine Stewardship Council Criteria. The report assesses the 23 major commercial tuna stocks worldwide against the Marine Stewardship Council (MSC) Fisheries Standard, offering an informed view of global progress and remaining gaps in achieving tuna fisheries sustainability.

This edition applies v3.1 of the MSC Fisheries Standard, evaluating tuna stock health (MSC Principle 1) and the effectiveness of regional management frameworks (part of MSC Principle 3). The report’s insights are useful in informing seafood stakeholders and policymakers about where improvements are most needed to meet rigorous sustainability benchmarks.

Key Findings

Co-authored by independent experts Matthew Cieri, Geir Hønneland, Paul A. H. Medley, and Susan Singh-Renton, the 2025 report shows that 12 of 23 tuna stocks meet the critical MSC Principle 1 benchmark — demonstrating that they are not subject to overfishing and are maintaining target biomass levels. This finding represents a slight improvement over the 2024 report, which found 11 passing stocks. This year, South Pacific albacore earned a passing score.

The 12 passing stocks are:

  • Atlantic Ocean: Western skipjack, Northern albacore, Southern albacore, Eastern bluefin
  • Pacific Ocean: Western yellowfin, Western bigeye, Western skipjack, Eastern yellowfin, Eastern skipjack, South Pacific albacore
  • Indian Ocean: Skipjack
  • Southern Hemisphere: Southern bluefin

However, only seven of the 23 stocks have fully implemented well-defined harvest control rules. The continued absence of pre-agreed harvest strategies to implement controls before rebuilding is required, or to rebuild depleted stocks, remains a major barrier to broader MSC adherence.

“Although the report highlights important strides by tuna Regional Fisheries Management Organizations (RFMOs), it also underscores that the urgency remains for adopting effective harvest control rules to prevent stock decline and ensure long-term sustainability,” said Susan Jackson, ISSF President. “Healthy fisheries require both sound science and robust governance.”

About the Report

Since 2013, ISSF’s annual Evaluation report has provided a consistent, science-based framework to measure tuna fisheries against the MSC sustainability criteria. This year’s report stands out for several reasons:

  • First use of MSC Version 3.1, which introduces more clear requirements around harvest control rules and other scoring elements
  • Full reassessment of the tuna RFMO portion of Principle 3 (Effective Management) — updated for the first time in several years, following a thorough review by one of the report co-authors
  • Updated scores reflect information available through March 2025

“These updates make the 2025 report especially useful,” said Dr. Victor Restrepo, ISSF Vice President of Science. “By applying the updated MSC criteria and reassessing management systems across all RFMOs, we’re able to provide clearer insights into where progress is being made — and where urgent action is still needed. And the report will be more helpful for fisheries that want to be certified using the updated MSC criteria.”

MSC Principle 1: Stock Status

MSC Principle 1 requires that fisheries avoid overfishing and support the recovery of depleted populations. The 2025 Evaluation report finds:

  • No change in the number of stocks with well-defined harvest control rules since 2024 — still only seven of 23
  • Failing stocks in the Atlantic: yellowfin, bigeye, Eastern skipjack, Mediterranean albacore, Western bluefin
  • Failing stocks in the Pacific: Eastern bigeye, Northern albacore, Pacific bluefin
  • Failing stocks in the Indian Ocean: yellowfin, bigeye, albacore

MSC Principle 3: Effective Management

MSC Principle 3 calls for an effective management system that ensures responsible and sustainable resource use while complying with legal and institutional frameworks.

  • All five tuna RFMOs — ICCAT, IOTC, IATTC, WCPFC, and CCSBT — received passing scores on Principle 3.
  • However, the report highlights ongoing concerns about compliance and enforcement across RFMOs, despite overall passing performance.

Verifying Seafood Industry Commitments

This Web feature highlights ISSF’s latest compliance report, which offers a compelling snapshot of sustainability progress and accountability in the global tuna industry. It documents how ISSF participating seafood companies and ProActive Vessel Register-listed vessels have voluntarily adopted ISSF conservation measures for responsible tuna sourcing and fishing.

ISSF Annual Compliance Report Highlights Industry Progress in Tuna Sustainability and New Conservation Requirements

The International Seafood Sustainability Foundation (ISSF) has published its latest ISSF Annual Conservation Measures & ProActive Vessel Register Compliance Report, showcasing the continued commitment of participating companies to sustainable tuna fisheries and responsible supply chains. For the 2024 audit period, the 24 ISSF participating companies achieved a 99.6% conformance rate across 33 ISSF conservation measures.

Download the compliance report, or view the PDF online.

The report also presents the first audited results for Conservation Measure (CM) 2.5 – Transparency in Reporting Progress Against ISSF’s Five-Year Goal and for the reduction in sourcing Indian Ocean yellowfin tuna, newly in effect under CM 1.3 – IOTC Yellowfin Tuna Rebuilding. In addition, it summarizes the aggregate compliance of vessels on the ProActive Vessel Register (PVR) with ISSF measures applicable to vessel operations.

Highlights of the ISSF Company and PVR Vessel Compliance Report

The report highlights progress by participating companies and vessels in advancing tuna fishery sustainability. It tracks conformance with a broad range of ISSF conservation measures, including:

Among participating companies, 21 of 24 fully complied with all 33 ISSF conservation measures during the reporting period. Three companies recorded a single major non-conformance each: one on CM 2.3 – Product Labeling by Species and Area of Capture and two on CM 1.3 – IOTC Yellowfin Tuna Rebuilding. The 99.6% conformance rate is a slight increase from 99.1% in November 2024.

PVR-listed vessels demonstrated an aggregate 77.5% compliance with 12 ISSF conservation measures that directly address vessel activity, including areas such as RFMO participation, use of non-entangling FADs, vessel-based FAD management policies, and observer coverage.

New and Notable ISSF Conservation Measures Audited

In 2024, all 24 ISSF participating companies achieved full conformance with CM 2.5 – Transparency in Reporting Progress Against ISSF’s Five-Year Goal. This measure requires companies to report the proportion of their tuna purchases from sustainable sources — such as Marine Stewardship Council (MSC)-certified fisheries or comprehensive Fishery Improvement Projects (FIPs) — and to provide roadmaps for improvement.

“Adding CM 2.5 to our compliance reporting reinforces ISSF’s commitment to continuous improvement and full supply-chain transparency,” said ISSF President Susan Jackson. “This measure gives retailers, NGOs, and other stakeholders the verified data they need to track how companies are advancing responsible sourcing in real, quantifiable terms.”

The report includes charts illustrating this newly audited individual company performance under CM 2.5. One chart shows the percentage of purchases by fishery source (e.g., MSC-certified fisheries, MSC-assessed fisheries, comprehensive FIPs), while the other details purchases by supplier type (e.g., ISSF participating companies, direct-from-vessel transactions). Together, these provide a clear view of how companies are progressing toward ISSF’s Five-Year Goal.

The report also shows that 22 of 24 ISSF participating companies were in full compliance with ISSF CM 1.3 – IOTC Yellowfin Tuna Rebuilding for the 2024 audit year. This measure supports stock recovery by requiring companies to publicly commit to and implement plans to reduce their sourcing of yellowfin tuna from the Indian Ocean. The specific requirement for companies to achieve sourcing reductions of 11% to 22%, based on their average annual Indian Ocean yellowfin purchases from 2017–2019, was newly audited and reported in this year’s compliance report.

“The Scientific Committee of the Indian Ocean Tuna Commission stated that larger catch reductions could allow the stock to recover sooner with a greater probability,” said Dr. Victor Restrepo, Chair, ISSF Scientific Advisory Committee. “Taken together, ISSF participating companies reduced sourcing of Indian Ocean yellowfin by 32.5%, well exceeding the intended goal of CM 1.3.”

“The adoption of CM 1.3 has been instrumental in aligning seafood industry practices with Indian Ocean Tuna Commission rebuilding efforts,” said marine scientist Dr. Andrew Rosenberg, Vice Chair, ISSF Board of Directors. “By setting a clear, science-based, measurable standard for sourcing reductions, the measure helps companies contribute directly to easing fishing pressure on the overfished yellowfin stock. This effort is essential for achieving sustainable fisheries.”

Reporting on Company Compliance Audits

ISSF’s commitment to transparency and accountability is reinforced through independent auditing by MRAG Americas, which assesses company compliance with ISSF conservation measures under a rigorous audit protocol. MRAG Americas also audits PVR vessels on compliance with vessel-related ISSF measures.

In addition to the summary report, MRAG Americas issues individual company compliance reports, which ISSF publishes on its website. PVR vessel compliance details are available on the PVR.

ISSF will publish the Update to the Annual Conservation Measures & ProActive Vessel Register Compliance Report in the fourth quarter of 2025 to reflect any improvements made by participating companies. Such updates will be noted in individual company reports available online.