In detailed tables, the snapshots compare tuna RFMO progress in implementing the practices.
For a high-level comparison across the five RFMOs, see our Tuna RFMO Best Practice Performance “scorecard” below. We also publish companion “best-practices reports” on these topics and “RFMO progress” infographics.
|Image||Title||Date||Author(s)||Language||RFMO(s)||Tag(s)||Category||Company||Report Type||Activity Year||Image||Title||Date||Author(s)||Language||RFMO(s)||Tag(s)||Category||Company||Report Type||Activity Year|
|Common Ground For Buyer Engagement In Support Of Tuna Sustainability Improvement||October 3, 2014||English||N/A||Advocacy, Tuna||Position Statements||N/A||Final||October 3, 2014|
|ISSF 2012-06: Fisheries Management and Job Creation in the Pacific Islands||January 23, 2012||Joshua Graff Zivin, Maria Damon||English||N/A||Advocacy||Scientific Reports, Technical Reports||N/A||Technical Report||January 23, 2012|
|Joint Letter to WCPFC (Nov. 27, 2017): Harvest Strategies, Non-entangling FADs, and Observer Coverage||November 30, 2017||English||WCPFC||Advocacy, Electronic Monitoring & Reporting, Harvest Control Rules, Harvest Strategies, Longline, Non-Entangling FADs, Observer Coverage, Tuna, WCPFC||Joint Advocacy, Joint Letters||N/A||Final||November 30, 2017|
|NGO Tuna Forum Global Tuna Sustainability Appeal (September 2018)||September 30, 2018||English||IATTC, ICCAT, IOTC, WCPFC||Advocacy, Electronic Monitoring & Reporting, Harvest Control Rules, IATTC, ICCAT, IOTC, Non-Entangling FADs, Observer Programs, WCPFC||Joint Advocacy, Joint Letters||N/A||Final||September 30, 2018|